CarBuyTip.com  
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
  Home > Car Reviews > Chevrolet Reviews > 1997 Chevrolet Camaro Car Review
 
 
 

1997 Chevrolet Camaro Car Review Picture

Car Reviews: 1997 Chevrolet Camaro

A remarkable performance bargain.

Due to their relatively low sales volumes,

sport coupe redesign intervals generally extend well beyond the shelf life

of a mainstream sedan. Which means they have to look good and perform well

for a long time. And that prescription accurately describes the Chevrolet

Camaro and its corporate cousin, the Pontiac Firebird. The Camaro and Firebird

(known in General Motors as the F-cars) looked great when they were renewed

for 1993 and still look great today.

These sleek coupes and convertibles offer sporting appeal and performance

ranging from really good to awesome, at prices that are surprisingly affordable.

The Camaro (our subject for this report), and Firebird are about as

American as it gets: long and low styling, a powerful engine mounted in

front and rear-wheel drive. More practical concerns, such as room for rear-seat

passengers, cargo capacity or fuel economy, are not really addressed with

these cars. But for style and performance at a great price, they're hard

to beat.

Basically, what we have to say about the Camaro also applies to the

Firebird; they are identical in engine choices, transmissions, suspension,

general interior layout, overall driving feel and most options.



1997 Chevrolet Camaro Car Model Comparisons




1997 Chevrolet Camaro Walkaround


The base Camaro is known simply as the Coupe or Convertible. Moving

up the price ladder from there is the RS trim level and above that the

high-performance Z28. Trim levels for the Pontiac variant are the standard

Firebird, the Formula and the hot rod Trans Am, all starting substantially

higher than their Chevy counterparts.

The base engine for both cars is GM's excellent Series II 3800 V6. Available

with either a four-speed automatic or (our preference) the standard five-speed

manual, it's rated at a robust 200 horsepower and an even more robust 225

lb.-ft. of torque. That's equivalent to many V8s, especially those of the

not-too-distant past, without the cost, fuel economy penalty or extra insurance

premium often associated with a V8. It's also available--in either the

Camaro or Firebird--with an optional performance package that includes

four-wheel disc brakes, a limited-slip differential, dual outlet exhaust,

P235/55R-16 tires on alloy wheels, quicker steering ratio and, if equipped

with the automatic transmission, a lower rear axle ratio, which enhances

acceleration.

Those wanting more and whose budgets will absorb not only the extra

cost of the car but also the extra cost of insurance, will opt for the

LT1 V8-powered Z28 (Formula or Trans Am if it's a Firebird). With 285 horsepower

and a standard six-speed manual transmission, it makes the Camaro or Firebird

a genuine high-performance car that's capable of 150 mph-plus.

If that's not enough, order the Camaro SS with forced air induction

or Firebird WS6 with Ram Air and the horsepower goes to 305, accompanied

by further suspension upgrades. When you get to this level, you'll be straddling

the $30,000 frontier, but you'll also be buying performance that would

cost about $20,000 more almost everywhere else.

For this review we looked at a base Camaro Coupe, which includes air

conditioning and the 3800 V6 with five-speed manual transmission. Base

price was $16,215, plus destination of $525. In addition, it had the $1231

Preferred Equipment Group 2, (option code 1SC), which includes cruise control,

remote hatch release, fog lamps, power doors, windows and mirrors, leather-wrapped

steering wheel, remote keyless entry and theft deterrent. The option code

Y87 performance package was another $400, 16-inch alloy wheels added $275,

the P235/55R16 tires were $132, the AM/FM cassette uplevel sound system

was $215, a rear window defogger added $170, power driver's seat was $270

and carpeted rear mats were $15. This brought it to $19,448, and gave us

a car with a remarkable combination of performance and price.

For some alternatives, base price plus destination on an RS coupe is

$18,495; on an unadorned Z28 coupe it's $20,640, which would give you a

lot of go for the money but you'd have to crank the windows and listen

to a basic radio. Or, load up a Z28 convertible until your pencil wore

out and the bottom line could eke over $31,000.



1997 Chevrolet Camaro Interior Features


Obviously, no car built low and sleek is going to offer much extra interior

room, and the Camaro is no exception. And compared to the Mustang, the

Camaro is lower and more difficult to get into and out of.

Another aspect of being in the Camaro is that the seating position,

for those in front, is low and somewhat reclining, with your legs extending

forward. Still, once you're in, the overall driving position, including

control layout and instrumentation, is actually pretty good and lends itself

quite well to the business of enthusiastic motoring. The front seat passenger

has about the same seating position, except the engineers placed the engine's

catalytic converter so that it creates a hump in the passenger's footwell,

which could be an annoyance to some. And when the passenger seat is empty,

the seatback flops forward under hard braking, a perennial annoyance in

these cars.

The tiny rear seats are shaped with deep buckets in the cushions, and

they're suitable only for small packages or really small people who don't

complain. Cargo space is also limited. Open the rear hatch and there's

a modest crosswise bin behind the rear axle, and a higher shelf that's

behind the rear seats. We're talking groceries for two. The rear seats

fold forward to expand luggage space, but if cargo space is a priority

you probably wouldn't be looking at a Camaro to begin with.



1997 Chevrolet Camaro Driving Impressions


Even in its base form, the Camaro will feel sporty to many drivers.

The low driving position and low center of gravity contribute to a hunkered-down,

responsive feel. And while the live axle layout at the rear might seem

dated, it gets the job done.

The engine is positioned somewhat rearward, enough so that with the

V6 is actually behind the centerline of the front wheels. This enhances

handling, by moving weight from the front to the rear. The front suspension

is upper and lower control arms, not struts. And the rear axle is suspended

on coil springs with a system of links that keep it properly located.

With the optional Performance Package, the Camaro (or Firebird) becomes

a remarkably good handling car-- better, in fact, than many that wear the

"sports car" label and cost a good deal more. Driven conservatively

the ride is smooth enough for reasonable sports car expectations and well

controlled. Driven with more enthusiasm, our Performance Package Camaro

had exceptional directional stability, good feedback through the steering

wheel and turned into corners with linear precision. We think it's one

of those cars that make you look for the long and winding road.

And we can't emphasize enough the significant role the 3800 V6 plays

in this. It's obviously not as fast as the V8-powered Z28, but it's fast

nonetheless, drives great, and hits several targets on the affordability

scale.



1997 Chevrolet Camaro Final Word


Obviously, these kinds of cars aren't for everyone. Interior room is

modest at best and the responsive performance entails some compromises.

But if your willingness to accept those compromises lines up with what

the Camaro, or the Firebird, can deliver, then you could be looking forward

to a lot of miles of driving pleasure, without busting your budget. And

lookin' good all the way.



  Get a FREE Car Price Quote, Sell your Used Car, or get a FREE loan Quote Today!


CarBuyTip.com Copyrighted all rights reserved 2008